In 2014, India did not merely change a government; it altered the very grammar of governance. The Planning Commission, once the backbone of India’s development strategy, was dismantled and replaced by the NITI Aayog.
This transition was presented as reform as flexibility over rigidity, vision over bureaucracy, cooperation over centralization. But over a decade later, a sharper question emerges: Have we replaced accountability with aspiration?
The Old Order: Measurable Governance
The Planning Commission was not perfect. It was often criticized for over-centralization and inefficiency. Yet, it operated within a clear administrative logic i.e. Targets were defined, Budgets were aligned, Policies were executed, Outcomes were measured. So, we can say that 'there was a system — imperfect, but verifiable and accountable. Where, you could ask a simple question: What was promised, and what was delivered?
The New Paradigm: Vision without Verification
The NITI Aayog represents a different philosophy. It speaks the language of: India @2030, India @2047, Viksit Bharat @2047 etc. That is long-term transformation and strategic intent, but governance cannot survive on intent alone. Because when you see and ask a few simple questions like;
1. Where are the annual milestones?
2. Where is measurable accountability?
3. Where is the structured evaluation of outcomes?
You will feel that this is 'A vision that cannot be broken into achievable steps risks becoming indistinguishable from imagination'.
A Subtle Shift: From Delivery to Narrative
This is where the real transformation lies. Because, Governance today increasingly answers not; “What have we achieved?” but rather; “What will we achieve in the future (Viksit Bharat @2047)?”
This is not just administrative drift, it is a shift in political philosophy. Now, in the recent past the emphasis moves from performance to projection, from metrics to messaging, and from accountability to aspiration.
The Mirage of the Future: Viksit Bharat @2047
Indian philosophical traditions have long warned against this tendency. The Gita treats constant boasting about future gains as the speech of the deluded, not the wise. The Yoga Vasistha, a text on supreme wisdom, treats the concept of "future time" as a mental illness when used to escape the present. "The future is as unreal as a city in the clouds."
All these sacred text emphasize that the constant invocation of the future - detached from present action - is not wisdom; it is escape. According to the Yoga Vashishth, "The future, when overused, becomes a construct of the mind - a convenient refuge from present accountability." In this real world, a mirage does not deceive by lying. It deceives by appearing real enough to sustain belief.
In governance, this mirage takes a familiar form: i.e. Prosperity is always coming, transformation is always near, and the destination is always ahead. But rarely, concretely, here.
The Political Utility of Distance
There is a structural advantage in speaking about 2047 instead of 2026 or 2027. Because, the farther the promise, the weaker the scrutiny. In most cases, immediate targets demand evidence, and distant visions demand just belief. And belief is easier to manufacture than performance.
When governance consistently shifts its reference point to the distant future, it creates a subtle but powerful dynamic: like, citizens remain engaged, but not empowered. And hope is sustained, but accountability is deferred.
The Core Problem
The issue is not vision. No nation can progress without imagining its future. So, the issue is imbalance. When a government: Speaks more about what will happen than what has happened, invests more in narrative than in measurement, relies more on aspiration than on verification, and most importantly, it risks transforming governance into perception management.
Conclusion: The Test of the Present
A government is not judged by the distance of its dreams,
but by the precision of its delivery. The real question is not: “Where will India be in 2047?” The real question is: “Where does India stand today, and why?” Because nations do not arrive at the future by dreaming about it. They arrive there by measuring, correcting, delivering and accountability consistently, in the present.
No comments:
Post a Comment